Bitcoin and Ether Are Not Securities in Belgium, Financial Regulator Clarifies


Bitcoin And Ether Are Not Securities In Belgium, Financial Regulator Clarifies

Cryptocurrencies like bitcoin and ether cannot be classified as securities or investment instruments, according to a communication issued by the financial watchdog in Belgium. The authority has tried to clarify the matter, noting that the digital coins may be subject to other regulations.

Bitcoin And Ether Are Not Securities In Belgium, Financial Regulator Clarifies

FSMA: Securities Laws Do Not Apply to Bitcoin and Other Decentralized Cryptocurrencies

In response to multiple requests for clarification from citizens and businesses, Belgium’s Financial Services and Markets Authority (FSMA) has explained why it believes bitcoin, ether and other similar cryptocurrencies cannot be considered securities or investment instruments.

Bitcoin And Ether Are Not Securities In Belgium, Financial Regulator Clarifies

According to its position published on Thursday, the country’s securities laws do not apply to such digital assets, which have no issuer and are created by a computer code as opposed to the execution of an agreement between an issuer and an investor.

Bitcoin And Ether Are Not Securities In Belgium, Financial Regulator Clarifies

However, the regulatory body pointed out that if these crypto assets have a payment or exchange function, if they are exchangeable or fungible, other regulations may be applicable to them as well as to the persons that are providing certain related services.

Bitcoin And Ether Are Not Securities In Belgium, Financial Regulator Clarifies

The FSMA further remarked that despite the lack of specific legislation, cryptocurrencies can be equated to securities if they are incorporated into financial instruments and have an issuer such as an individual or a legal entity.

Bitcoin And Ether Are Not Securities In Belgium, Financial Regulator Clarifies

Seeking to provide assistance to interested parties, that have been sending more and more questions about the financial rules concerning crypto assets, the authority has adopted a “stepwise plan” to offer a series of guidelines for their classification.

Bitcoin And Ether Are Not Securities In Belgium, Financial Regulator Clarifies

The Belgian financial watchdog emphasized that the plan is neutral regarding technology. “The qualification as security, financial instrument or investment instrument does not depend on the technology that is being used,” it elaborated, adding that it’s ready to update the plan in order to reflect regulatory changes in the future.

One such event could be the upcoming adoption of the EU’s Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) framework, which was agreed upon by European institutions and member states at the end of June. In July, the FSMA launched a consultation on the classification of crypto assets. Earlier this year, the watchdog introduced registration requirements for crypto exchange and wallet service providers.

Tags in this story

Authority, Belgian, belgium, Bitcoin, clarification, Communication, Crypto, crypto assets, Cryptocurrencies, Cryptocurrency, ether, FSMA, guidelines, Instruments, plan, regulator, Securities, Status, watchdog

Do you expect authorities in other European jurisdictions to issue similar clarifications regarding the status of cryptocurrencies? Share your thoughts on the subject in the comments section below.

Lubomir Tassev

Lubomir Tassev is a journalist from tech-savvy Eastern Europe who likes Hitchens’s quote: “Being a writer is what I am, rather than what I do.” Besides crypto, blockchain and fintech, international politics and economics are two other sources of inspiration.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons, Werner Lerooy / Shutterstock.com

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

More Popular NewsIn Case You Missed It



Source

Recommended For You

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *